Master MCP Q & A: 1. INTRODUCTIONWhen the redesigned Waste Site Cleanup Program started operating in October 1. Massachusetts Contingency Plan or . To respond to these questions in a timely and consistent way, Mass. DEP's Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup issued . Questions have been placed in the Subpart section that seemed to be the most appropriate. Please note that some of the questions may address more than one MCP Subpart. Must a remedial action plan be submitted to conduct pilot tests? In all cases, Remediation Wastes, Remedial Wastewater, and Remedial Air Emissions must be managed in accordance with 3. CMR 4. 0. 0. 04. 0 through 4. Is a drainage ditch included in the definition of ? While the purposes of the Water Supply and the Waste Site Cleanup Q& A definitions are related, there are distinct differences that have led Mass. DEP to maintain both definitions of tributary for the time being. Mass. DEP is currently reviewing this issue and considering changes that will result in one definition of tributary in both sets of regulations. However, until a definition of tributary is incorporated into the MCP, parties conducting response actions that fall solely under the MCP should continue to refer to the Q& A definition. SUBPART A PILOT PROJECTS AND LICENSING REQUIREMENTS Under what regulatory vehicle may soil vapor and/or groundwater extraction pilot tests be conducted? Are they 'assessment' or 'remediation'? Must a remedial action plan be submitted to conduct. S ince founded in 1997, Fame Master has been specializing in designing, manufacturing and exporting plastic educational toys, puzzle educational toys and figurine toys of high quality and innovation on a worldwide basis. In 1998, we created our first figurine. Budget Definition: A budget is a set of interlinked plans that quantitatively describe an entity's projected future operations. A budget is used as a yardstick against which to measure actual operating results, for the allocation of funding, and as a plan for future. METALLICA lyrics - 'Master Of Puppets' (1986) album, including 'Damage, Inc.', 'Orion', 'Leper Messiah'. Battery Lashing out the action, returning the reaction Weak are ripped and torn away Hypnotizing power, crushing all that cower Battery is here to. Is filing for bankruptcy protection considered a force majeure event for purposes of MCP deadline extensions under 3. CMR 4. 0. 0. 02. 5? As defined in 3. 10 CMR 4. Under 3. 10 CMR 4. Department of such inability. Annual compliance fees are substantially reduced in cases where financial inability is demonstrated. Is the Interim Wellhead Protection Area for Non- Community Water Supplies a 1/2 mile radius around the well? The Action Master toyline, depicting the obvious oxymoron of 'Transformers who don't transform,' generated initial ire ('BLASPHEMY!') from some fans. This was magnified as Action Masters were released in the final year of the original Transformers toy line in the. However, for a well with a pumping rate less than 1. Zone II has not been defined, the Interim Wellhead Protection Area radius can be calculated by using the following equation: IWPA (in feet) = 3. Interim Wellhead Protection Area definition, 3. CMR 4. 0. 0. 00. 6). For wells where the daily pumping rate is not known, Mass. DEP Division of Water Supply Policy #9. What does this mean for my cleanup and how do I find out if an APD exists? These municipal designations must be in the form of: a) a local ordinance or bylaw adopted by the municipality (e. Aquifer Protection District or Zone); b) an intermunicipal agreement approved by the municipal legislative body; or c) an executed inter- governmental contract for the purchase or sale of drinking water. Groundwater contamination within these designated areas must be cleaned up to GW- 1 standards to meet the requirement of a Permanent Solution. BWSC Priority Resource Maps do not include Aquifer Protection Districts, intermunicipal agreements, or inter- governmental contracts. To find out if your site is located in an area legally designated for groundwater protection, contact the municipal planning department, board of health, or water department. The 2. 1E Priority Resource map that I ordered from Mass. GIS shows my site as located in a Non- Potential Drinking Water Source Area (NPDWSA). When I visited my site I realized that the surrounding 1. MCP criteria for NPDWSA. This source information was the best available at the time it was gathered and may contain errors and/or omissions. People conducting cleanups should be aware that the maps are to be used only as a guide. Actual information gathered from visiting the site should be the basis for determining if the area actually meets the NPDWSA definition in the MCP. Master Creator Julia Bettencourt Posted September 04, 2003 Here we are and it's fall again. Where I live in California, it is just beginning to cool off from the summer heat. Some of the trees are just beginning to loose a few leaves but eventually the fall weather will.If the site- specific information disagrees with the GIS map, the site- specific information should be used to classify the groundwater appropriately. The same is true of areas which are mapped as Potential Drinking Water Source Areas - if actual site information shows that NPDWSA criteria do apply in a mapped Potential Drinking Water Source Area, then cleanup should be based on actual rather than mapped information. If you send map corrections to Mass. DEP, we will update the GIS data so that future maps will be more accurate. BWSC's guidance document, . This part of town (including my site) has been rezoned for future development of a 1. Does this mean that my site is now located in a Non- Potential Drinking Water Source Area because of the new zoning or will be located in a NPDWSA once this development occurs? Non- Potential Drinking Water Source Areas are defined based on development that was in place before January 1, 1. MCP. Municipal zoning should not be used since it does not always identify actual land uses. M. G. L. I now need to remove this sand, which is contaminated with petroleum compounds. Is this sand considered a ? How can it be managed? Sand, sludge, liquids, debris and other materials inside of an underground storage tank, drum, engineered impoundment or other fabricated container meet the definition of . The regulatory classification of the Containerized Waste inside the tank dictates what the management requirements are for these waste materials. Assuming that the tank was not emptied of its contents prior to placement of the sand, then in accordance with the Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Regulations . Containerized Waste that is classified as a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Hazardous Waste regulations when removed from the tank, not the Remediation Waste regulations, since the definition of Remediation Waste specifically excludes Containerized Waste. Containerized Waste that is not classified as a Hazardous Waste is considered to be a Solid Waste and, if eligible, these materials may be managed under the policies COMM #9. WSC #9. 4- 4. 00. The sand in the tank may, under certain circumstances, be considered a non- hazardous waste or a solid waste if all of the contents of the tank were removed, including all residual product and sludge, before the sand was placed into the tank. However, the presence of a discrete sludge layer, non- aqueous phase liquid, or the presence of highly contaminated and/or product saturated soils inside the tank would indicate that the tank was not properly cleaned. Therefore these Containerized Wastes may require management as a hazardous waste when removed from the tank. What are the new MCP procedures for using a Bill of Lading (BOL) to transport contaminated media? Do they apply to all sites? These provisions apply to all disposal sites, including those with approved waivers. If If a party wishes to use a BOL, he/she must engage a Licensed Site Professional (LSP) to oversee the characterization and transport of the remediation waste. Alternatively, remediation wastes may be transported using a hazardous waste manifest, in which case an LSP is not required to manage the shipment. What signatures are required for the Bill of Lading? A completed Bill of Lading, including original signatures must be submitted to Mass. DEP within 3. 0 days of the date of final shipment from the site ? Can a Bill of Lading be used for the transport of these soils off- site? Pursuant to 3. 10 CMR 4. CMR 4. 0. 0. 30. 0 and 4. Department. These materials cannot be disposed of at a location where the concentrations in the soil would exceed notification thresholds at the receiving site or where existing concentrations at the receiving site are significantly lower than the concentrations in the soils that are being disposed of or reused . A Bill of Lading may be used in such cases, but is not required. The D. C. Court of Appeals in the case Association of Battery Recyclers, Inc. U. S Environmental Protection Agency (decided August 2. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for evaluating whether manufactured gas plant (MGP) wastes (MGP- contaminated soil) are a hazardous waste. What is the impact of this decision on managing MGP wastes generated as part of response actions at 2. E sites? Therefore, MGP remediation wastes generated at 2. E sites that exhibit the toxicity characteristic under 3. CMR 3. 0. 1. 55. B (TCLP) and 3. CMR 3. 0. 1. 25. B (TC Rule) when transported from a disposal site must be managed in Massachusetts as a hazardous waste, including the use of a hazardous waste transporter, hazardous waste manifest, and the applicable hazardous waste code. However, such wastes may be shipped to a non- hazardous waste facility in another state, provided that the receiving facility is legally authorized to accept MGP remediation wastes and complies with the requirements of the receiving state. In addition, such remediation wastes must still be managed within the disposal site in compliance with the provisions of 3. CMR 4. 0. 0. 03. 0. When must a 2. 1E Bill of Lading or a Material Shipping Record be used for transporting contaminated soil? If this material is a listed hazardous waste (other than oil), or a characteristic hazardous waste, only a hazardous waste manifest may be used. Contaminated soil containing OHM at concentrations less than an applicable release notification threshold established by 3. CMR 4. 0. 0. 30. 0, or which are exempt from a release notification threshold under 3. CMR 4. 0. 0. 31. 7, need not be transported in accordance with the 2. E BOL provisions. Contaminated soil generated from out- of- state locations also is not subject to the 2. E BOL requirements of the MCP. In these cases, however, if the soil is considered a listed hazardous waste (other than oil) or a characteristic hazardous waste, a hazardous waste manifest must be used to transport it. Soil that does not require the use of a 2. E BOL and is not a hazardous waste may be shipped to a landfill or permitted soil- processing facility in Massachusetts using a Material Shipping Record (MSR). While no regulatory provision requires the use of a 2. E BOL for these classes of materials, landfills and soil processing facilities may accept such material under a 2. E BOL at their discretion. The MSR provides for a certification by a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) on the adequacy of soil characterization and management, unless the document is approved by Mass.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |